When Do You Need an Auto Accident Defense Attorney?

Source: pixabay.com

Car accidents can happen anytime to anybody, even when taking necessary measures and observing all the traffic rules. When it occurs, you will need an auto accident defense attorney to represent you in court. By now, you know that accidents can complicate and affect your life negatively depending on their seriousness. In addition, you will have to contend with insurance companies that have their interests to look out for.

Accidents are not always your fault; however, a lawsuit filed against you can be enough to shake your composure and determination, as well as to necessitate considerable expenditures of time and resources. Therefore, it is best to understand the available legal options.

This article explains why you need auto accident attorneys, their benefits, legal options, and how to avoid auto accident liabilities.

Source: businesspartnermagazine.com

Fabre Defense

Fabre defense is a type of defense accessible to the defendant in which they can identify or name a person involved in the auto accident and might or ought to face all or a portion of the blame. Applying the Fabre defense, the people or entities the defendant believes caused the accident can be brought into the litigation to recoup the plaintiff’s damages.

There are many accident situations when a third party was negligent at the time of the accident, such as not maintaining a road or providing proper illumination, which are examples of when the Fabre defense may be used. Other third parties could, in such cases, be liable for all or a portion of the damages incurred by the person or plaintiff.

Also highlighted is the possibility that if the person designated for a Fabre defense is determined to be blameless, the defendant might sometimes be liable for the third party’s legal costs.

Avoiding or reducing liability in auto accidents

Also, consider that irrespective of who is responsible for an accident, it is always advantageous to have a car accident lawyer. Defenses include reducing your damages or apportioning blame to third parties, such as the maker of a faulty seatbelt, irrespective of liability.

Source: tatelawoffices.com

How an auto accident defense attorney can be helpful

Attorneys are more qualified to counsel us on legal topics, such as the defense of an auto accident lawsuit, because they are familiar with the complexities of the law. Even if it is determined that you contributed significantly to the accident, the attorney can still be valuable by reducing damages and leaving you with far fewer obligations than you otherwise would have been facing.

No matter how obvious it may seem, an accident can originate from several factors that worked together to cause the accident. Nobody wants to create an accident intentionally, and most accidents also occur due to carelessness or other inescapable circumstances.

Why do auto accident defense lawyers not accept contingency fees?

Contingency fee arrangements are impossible for defendants in vehicle accident lawsuits since the defendant receives no payment if the case is won. Instead, they just avoid paying money to the injured person who filed the lawsuit.

In rare cases, you may have been charged as a defendant but also filed a countersuit. This frequently occurs when each party raises a finger at the other and blames them for the disaster.

Source: truittlawoffices.com

Strategies for auto accident defense attorneys

A few of the arguments an auto accident defense attorney might make are included below:

The claimant was in charge of the accident.

Comparative negligence is a defense strategy that fits this description. This means that a judge need not hold one party entirely accountable for the damage. Only 60% of the blame for the accident may lie with the defendant. A court may completely dismiss the plaintiff’s claim if it determines that he or she was more than 50% at fault for the accident.

The plaintiff’s claims are false or exaggerated.

Auto accident defense attorneys will start by doing this. The court can clear the record in case of personal injury or false claims. If the injury attorney cannot support the complainant’s claims, this will occur.

Auto accident defense attorneys use this strategy to argue that the plaintiff is exaggerating their pain and suffering. If the court rejects defense claims, the plaintiff can receive reduced compensation for the losses or none at all.

Source: malloy-law.com

The complainant lately filed the lawsuit.

The plaintiffs’ injuries might not always be immediately apparent. Most people wait until their injuries cost them money to file a personal injury claim when they begin missing work or accrue medical debt. The statute of limitations may have passed by the time they file a case if their injuries do not manifest for six months.

If the plaintiff files at the end of the limitations period, the defense attorney may raise this argument even if the statute of limitations has not yet run. It might show a judge that the plaintiff is patient if it took many years to initiate a lawsuit.

The defendant owed the complainant no duty of care

To establish that the defendant was responsible for the accident, the accused had to owe the plaintiff a duty of care, which they disregarded, resulting in the accident. For example, when driving, one has a duty of care for other motorists. People neglect their duty of care when they break the law on the road.

Source: simmonsandfletcher.com


The majority of personal injury attorneys take contingent fees from accident victims. But those who are accused of misconduct in court proceedings also require counsel. Fortunately, their insurance provider should be able to allocate an attorney and cover the cost of counsel. They need an auto accident defense attorney with experience to defend those being sued.

Tangible and eyewitness accounts are two types of proof that auto accident defense attorneys will use to demonstrate that their client is not at fault. Nevertheless, auto accident defense attorneys would go to great lengths in a personal injury lawsuit to refute the plaintiff’s allegations.